https://indianmasterminds.com

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Bombay High Court Dismisses IPS Officer Abdur Rahman’s Plea for Voluntary Retirement

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Arif S Doctor ruled that the CAT's decision did not warrant any interference from the court.
Indian Masterminds Stories

In a significant legal decision, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday rejected a plea filed by IPS officer Abdur Rahman (1997, Maharashtra) seeking voluntary retirement, affirming the earlier verdict of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) from December 2023 that denied his request.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Arif S Doctor ruled that the CAT’s decision did not warrant any interference from the court. The bench stated, “Resultantly, the writ petition fails, which is hereby dismissed.”

Abdur Rahman, a 1997 batch IPS officer, had filed the plea earlier this year, citing his nomination by the Prakash Ambedkar-led Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi (VBA) for the Dhule Lok Sabha constituency as the reason for seeking retirement. His plea argued against the rejection of his voluntary retirement application by authorities.

Senior advocate Arshad Shaikh and advocate Jasim A Shaikh, representing Rahman, highlighted that he had resigned from his position as Inspector General (IG) of the State Human Rights Commission in 2019 in protest against the Citizen Amendment Act (CAA) Bill. However, his subsequent applications for voluntary retirement were not accepted.

The court noted that Rahman’s applications for voluntary retirement had been declined by the Union and state home ministries on various grounds, including pending disciplinary proceedings. Despite these challenges, Rahman’s appeal against the rejection in the CAT was dismissed in December last year, prompting him to approach the Bombay High Court.

The High Court acknowledged the disciplinary issues against Rahman, including multiple charge-sheets issued against him for alleged violations of service rules and misconduct related to personal matters and public statements. The court, however, deferred the decision on penalties associated with these charges to the competent authority, stating it was not within its purview to preempt such decisions.


Indian Masterminds Stories
Related Stories
NEWS
Indian Forest
India Sees Modest Increase in Forest and Tree Cover, ISFR 2023 Reveals
GST Council
GST Council Approves Track and Trace Mechanism, Reduces Tax Rates on Key Goods and Services
GST Council
GST Council Meeting in Jaisalmer to Discuss Tax Reductions on Insurance and Other Items
IREDA logo 1
IREDA Secures Triple Win at PSE Excellence Awards
Gujarat-government resized
Gujarat: IAS Mayur K. Mehta & P.J. Bhagdev Transferred, Check New Postings Here
IPS A.B
Andhra Govt Drops Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired IPS A.B. Venkateswara Rao
Maharashtra govt-logo
Maharashtra Inducts 23 Deputy Collectors into IAS, Marking Historic Promotion Drive
IAS A Santhi Kumari
CAT Grants Telangana CS A. Santhi Kumari 2 Weeks to Comply with IFS Ratnakar Jauhari Posting Order
Videos
Malathi Priya
 Balancing Nature, Career, and Family: Life of IFS Officer Dr. Malathi Priya 
Golden Temple Ramesh Inder Singh
The Difference Between Operation Blue Star and Black Thunder When Not A Single Bullet Was Fired, Tells Then DC Amritsar Ramesh Inder Singh?
Eshani Anand
Ace the UPSC Interview: Insights from AIR 79, Eshani Anand
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest
Madhukar Kumar Bhagat
IRS Officer Presents India’s Soul Through Culture, Not Chronology
Indian Forest
India Sees Modest Increase in Forest and Tree Cover, ISFR 2023 Reveals
ADVERTISEMENT
Videos
Malathi Priya
Golden Temple Ramesh Inder Singh
Eshani Anand
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT