New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on Friday refused to quash an FIR against former IAS officer Pradip N Sharma, an IAS officer of 1984 batch from Gujarat cadre, in connection with a land-allotment dispute dating back to 2011. However, the top court granted anticipatory bail to Sharma, noting that the case will primarily be investigated based on documentary evidence.
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta emphasized that the scope for quashing an FIR is limited and should be exercised only in exceptional cases. The court observed that the allegations against Sharma involve serious charges, including misuse of official position, criminal breach of trust, and alleged corrupt practices in the discharge of public duties. Therefore, it decided to allow the case to proceed.
In its judgment, the bench noted, “The prayer seeking quashing of the FIR and the criminal proceedings is refused, as the allegations against the applicant involve serious allegations of misuse of official position, criminal breach of trust and alleged corrupt practices in the discharge of public duties.”
The Case Details: The case stems from a complaint filed by the mamlatdar (revenue officer) of Tankara village in Rajkot, Gujarat, against Sharma, who was the district collector at the time. The FIR accuses Sharma of criminal breach of trust and dishonestly making false claims in a court regarding the allotment of land.
The dispute revolves around a parcel of land that had been allotted to D J Mehta and others in Anandpara. The land was confiscated by the state government because the allottees were not residing in the village or cultivating the land. In 2006-07, the landowners appealed before Sharma, who subsequently allotted the land back to Mehta via an ex-parte order. This order was later challenged, and the Principal Secretary of Revenue (Appeals) in Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the government.
Despite this, Mehta challenged the decision before the Gujarat High Court, which upheld Sharma’s order. The complainant in the case alleges that Sharma, knowing that the landowners were living abroad, passed the order to favor them without verifying the authenticity of the power-of-attorney holders.
Court’s Observations: The Supreme Court stated that the allegations against Sharma involve his decision to favor private land allottees, despite their prolonged absence from the country, and his transfer out of the jurisdiction. The bench further pointed out that the case required a thorough investigation, particularly with respect to the jurisdiction of Sharma at the time of passing the impugned order, the potential collusion, and the legal status of the land.
The court highlighted that the FIR and evidence presented at this stage suggest the commission of cognizable offences, which warrant a full investigation. It emphasized that allegations such as these cannot be settled based solely on the pleadings and require scrutiny of official records and procedural compliance.
Anticipatory Bail: Given the nature of the allegations and the fact that the investigation will primarily rely on documentary evidence, the bench granted anticipatory bail to Sharma. The court directed that Sharma may be released on furnishing a personal bond of Rs 1 lakh to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.
The bench also noted that Sharma should cooperate fully during the investigation. If custodial investigation is deemed necessary, the investigating agency can apply to the magistrate for the appropriate orders.
This ruling sets the stage for a detailed investigation into the allegations against the former IAS officer, while ensuring that Sharma’s legal rights are protected during the process.
