https://indianmasterminds.com

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Supreme Court Questions ED’s Motive Behind Retired IAS Anil Tuteja’s Hasty Arrest In The Alleged Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam

During the hearing, the Supreme Court asked the ED to explain its process in summoning Officer Tuteja, particularly the rush in serving the summons and detaining him
Indian Masterminds Stories

The Supreme Court has lately raised concerns about the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) handling of the arrest of retired IAS officer Anil Tuteja, who is implicated in an alleged liquor scam in Chhattisgarh. The court questioned the speed and manner in which Tuteja was summoned and arrested. During the hearing, the Supreme Court asked the ED to explain its process in summoning Officer Tuteja, particularly the rush in serving the summons and detaining him.

This inquiry followed Tuteja’s plea challenging the Chhattisgarh High Court’s decision to not quash the corruption and money laundering charges against him. Mr. Tuteja is a 2003-batch retired IAS officer. The court highlighted that ex-IAS Tuteja was already being questioned by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) when the ED issued its summons. The first summons was delivered at noon, followed by another just a few hours later.

Please clarify this procedure. He is at the ACB office when the ED issues summons at 12:00 PM and then again at 5:30 PM. What’s the hurry?” the bench inquired.

The justices also questioned why the ED chose to summon Officer Tuteja at a specific time, given that he was already being interrogated by ACB officials. They sought clarification on why ACB officers escorted Mr. Tuteja to the ED’s office and whether his appearance was voluntary.

Tuteja’s counsel informed the court that his client faced questioning by the ED throughout the night. The court expressed its disapproval, stating, “What kind of practice is this? Interrogating someone all night is unacceptable.

The Supreme Court emphasized the need to adhere to due process, reminding the ED of the constitutional rights protected under Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.

They should remember there’s something called Article 21,” the bench remarked. The Supreme Court has directed the ED to submit an additional affidavit detailing how the summons was issued under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), along with the circumstances surrounding Officer Tuteja’s early morning arrest. The court will continue its hearing on the case on November 5th.


Indian Masterminds Stories
Related Stories
NEWS
Indian Forest
India Sees Modest Increase in Forest and Tree Cover, ISFR 2023 Reveals
GST Council
GST Council Approves Track and Trace Mechanism, Reduces Tax Rates on Key Goods and Services
GST Council
GST Council Meeting in Jaisalmer to Discuss Tax Reductions on Insurance and Other Items
IREDA logo 1
IREDA Secures Triple Win at PSE Excellence Awards
Gujarat-government resized
Gujarat: IAS Mayur K. Mehta & P.J. Bhagdev Transferred, Check New Postings Here
IPS A.B
Andhra Govt Drops Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired IPS A.B. Venkateswara Rao
Maharashtra govt-logo
Maharashtra Inducts 23 Deputy Collectors into IAS, Marking Historic Promotion Drive
IAS A Santhi Kumari
CAT Grants Telangana CS A. Santhi Kumari 2 Weeks to Comply with IFS Ratnakar Jauhari Posting Order
Videos
Malathi Priya
 Balancing Nature, Career, and Family: Life of IFS Officer Dr. Malathi Priya 
Golden Temple Ramesh Inder Singh
The Difference Between Operation Blue Star and Black Thunder When Not A Single Bullet Was Fired, Tells Then DC Amritsar Ramesh Inder Singh?
Eshani Anand
Ace the UPSC Interview: Insights from AIR 79, Eshani Anand
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest
Madhukar Kumar Bhagat
IRS Officer Presents India’s Soul Through Culture, Not Chronology
Indian Forest
India Sees Modest Increase in Forest and Tree Cover, ISFR 2023 Reveals
ADVERTISEMENT
Videos
Malathi Priya
Golden Temple Ramesh Inder Singh
Eshani Anand
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT