New Delhi: The Supreme Court has issued notice on a contempt petition alleging that the Union Ministry of Education did not comply with an earlier court direction to examine a representation seeking regulation and monitoring of such institutions. The matter is being heard by the country’s highest court and could have significant implications for education oversight and child welfare.
Details of Unregistered Institutions Row
The case originates from a petition filed by BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay. He raised concerns that thousands of unregistered institutions across India may be operating without proper supervision and could be influencing young children under the guise of providing religious instruction.
Read also: Why This Supreme Court Judgment Could Change Human Rights Litigation In India
The petition sought government action to register, recognize, supervise, and monitor institutions imparting secular and religious education to children below 14 years of age.
Unregistered Institutions Row: What Did The Petitioner Argue
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay argued that there are numerous institutions functioning without proper registration and regulation. According to the petition, such institutions should be monitored to ensure that children receive education in a safe and lawful environment. The petitioner emphasized that both secular and religious educational institutions should be subject to proper oversight mechanisms.
Constitutional Arguments Raised
The petitioner referred to constitutional provisions relating to educational and religious institutions. He argued that Article 30, which grants minorities the right to establish and administer educational institutions, should not exempt institutions from reasonable regulation.
The petition also discussed Articles 19 and 26 while raising questions regarding governance and supervision of educational institutions.
Unregistered Institutions Row: Earlier Supreme Court Direction
On May 11, 2026, the Supreme Court disposed of Upadhyay’s earlier plea. Instead of issuing direct directions, the Court asked the Central government to consider a representation submitted by Upadhyay regarding the issue. The Court instructed the government to take a decision within two months.
Why Was A Contempt Petition Filed
According to the contempt petition, the Ministry of Education allegedly failed to examine and decide the representation within the timeline fixed by the Supreme Court.
Upadhyay argued that the Court’s order had not been implemented despite the passage of several months. As a result, he approached the Supreme Court again, this time seeking contempt proceedings against the concerned officials.
Unregistered Institutions Row: Supreme Court Issues Notice
A Bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Sheel Nagu heard the matter. The Court sought a response from TK Anil Kumar, Secretary of the Union Ministry of Education. The Bench issued notice on the contempt petition and scheduled the matter for further hearing.
Next Hearing Date
The Supreme Court has listed the matter for hearing on October 16. The Court will examine whether its earlier directions were complied with by the concerned authorities.
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of Contempt Proceedings
During the hearing, the Supreme Court clarified that the present proceedings relate only to contempt allegations.
The Court stated that it would focus on whether its previous order was complied with and not on broader constitutional questions at this stage. The Bench indicated that constitutional issues may be examined separately if required in future proceedings.
Read also: Who Will Regulate AI Deepfakes? Supreme Court Takes Up Crucial National Debate
FAQs
The Supreme Court issued notice on a contempt petition alleging that the Ministry of Education failed to comply with an earlier court order directing it to consider a representation regarding monitoring educational institutions.
The petition was filed by BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, who raised concerns about unregistered institutions and their oversight.
The Court will determine whether its earlier directions were followed by the Ministry of Education and whether any contempt of court has occurred.
