Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court courtroom vandalism case has raised serious concerns about the safety and dignity of India’s judicial system.
The court has recommended criminal contempt proceedings and FIRs against lawyers allegedly involved in violence inside Courtroom No. 49 on October 28, 2026. The court has also called for action against people spreading false information about the incident on social media.
Details of Allahabad Courtroom Violence
The incident took place on October 28, 2026, inside Courtroom No. 49 of the Allahabad High Court in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.
Read also: Why Allahabad High Court Orders the CCTV Check in the Court Premises
According to the court’s 29-page order, a group of lawyers allegedly gathered inside the courtroom, raised slogans and disrupted judicial proceedings.
The situation became more serious after the judges left the courtroom. Some lawyers allegedly attacked government advocates, court employees and security personnel.
Additional Government Advocate (AGA-I) Paritosh Kumar Malviya was reportedly seriously assaulted. He reached the judges’ chambers in an injured condition and sought protection.
Other government lawyers and court staff also reported physical attacks and threats. The incident led to damage to courtroom furniture and disrupted the normal functioning of the court.
Allahabad Courtroom Violence: High Court Makes Strong Observations
A Division Bench comprising Justice Ajay Bhanot and Justice Divesh Chandra Samant passed a strongly worded 29-page order dated October 29, 2026.
The order was made public on November 2, 2026.
The judges expressed serious concern over the behaviour of the lawyers allegedly involved in the violence. The Bench observed that it was difficult to believe whether the court was dealing with lawyers or a mob involved in violence.
The court made it clear that violence cannot be ignored in the name of maintaining peace between lawyers and judges. It also warned that ignoring violence inside courtrooms could make the judicial system vulnerable to pressure and intimidation.
Court Recommends Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Lawyers
One of the most important developments is the recommendation for criminal contempt proceedings against the lawyers allegedly involved in the incident.
The Bench observed that their alleged actions affected the authority of the court, disrupted judicial proceedings and obstructed the administration of justice.
The matter has been referred to the Chief Justice for consideration and further action under the law. The Chief Justice may place the matter before an appropriate bench to consider initiating criminal contempt proceedings.
Criminal contempt is a serious legal matter because it involves actions that can damage the authority of courts or interfere with the administration of justice.
Allahabad Courtroom Violence: Allahabad High Court Recommends FIR Registration
The court has also requested the Chief Justice to consider directing the Registrar General to ensure the registration of FIRs against the people allegedly involved in the violence. The proposed FIRs may cover several alleged offences, including:
- Instigating violence inside the courtroom.
- Planning and conspiring to commit violence.
- Physically attacking government lawyers and court staff.
- Damaging courtroom property.
- Preventing government officials from performing their official duties.
These are recommendations for legal action. The concerned authorities will have to follow the applicable legal process.
Court Seeks Action Against Fake Social Media Posts
The Allahabad High Court has also expressed concern about misleading information circulated on social media after the incident.
The Bench observed that false reports, half-truths and misleading posts could damage the reputation of the High Court and create unnecessary public distrust.
The court requested action against individuals who allegedly created or circulated false and malicious content about the incident.
It also sought directions to block and delete such posts from social media platforms.
This development highlights the growing importance of responsible online communication, especially when information concerns sensitive legal matters.
Background of Allahabad Courtroom Violence
The dispute reportedly started on October 27, 2026, following a letter issued by the newly elected office-bearers of the Allahabad High Court Bar Association.
The letter raised allegations about the treatment of lawyers during proceedings in Justice Ajay Bhanot’s courtroom.
It also claimed that an advocate had been threatened with imprisonment and forced to apologise to a police officer. However, the Division Bench found these claims factually incorrect.
The court clarified that no order directing the imprisonment of the advocate had been passed or recorded.
It also noted that senior advocate V.P. Srivastava had appeared before the Bench and clarified that no incident of his humiliation had taken place as alleged. The court expressed concern that serious allegations had been circulated without properly checking the facts.
Read also: UP Has 1 State Forensic Lab and 12 Regional Labs: Allahabad High Court Seeks Reply to State
FAQs
The incident happened on October 28, 2026, inside Courtroom No. 49 of the Allahabad High Court in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.
The Allahabad High Court recommended criminal contempt proceedings because some lawyers allegedly assaulted government advocates, disrupted court proceedings and vandalised Courtroom No. 49 on October 28, 2026.
The court requested the Chief Justice to consider directing the Registrar General to ensure FIR registration against the lawyers allegedly involved in the violence. It also recommended action against people who circulated false social media posts about the incident.
