New Delhi: The Supreme Court has modified the multi-state Co-operative Bank board removal rule and directed that RBI can remove multi-state Co-Operative Bank Board beyond 6 months. The verdict strengthens the Reserve Bank of India’s regulatory powers over multi-state co-operative banks and clarifies the interpretation of constitutional and banking laws.
The ruling came in a case involving the supersession of the Board of Directors of Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank, where former board members challenged the RBI’s decision and its extension beyond six months.
Details of Multi-State Co-Operative Bank Board Removal Rule
A Bench of Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe upheld the Bombay High Court’s judgment and ruled that the RBI’s powers under Section 36AAA of the Banking Regulation Act continue to apply to multi-state co-operative banks.
Read also: Who Is DY Chandrachud? Why Has Russia Chosen Former CJI for a Major Arbitration Case?
The Court said that Article 243ZL of the Constitution cannot be interpreted in a way that restricts RBI’s statutory powers over banking institutions. According to the judgment, the Banking Regulation Act remains applicable to multi-state co-operative banks through the constitutional framework itself.
Background Of The Multi-State Co-Operative Bank Board Removal Rule
Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank was originally registered as a co-operative society under Maharashtra law. Over time, it became a bank and later acquired the status of a multi-state co-operative bank after amalgamations involving banks from Gujarat and Karnataka.
RBI Action Against The Board
In November 2023, the RBI exercised its powers under Section 36AAA of the Banking Regulation Act and superseded the bank’s Board of Directors for one year. An Administrator was appointed to manage the affairs of the bank.
The RBI cited concerns about the bank’s financial condition, the need to protect depositors, and the requirement for professional management to restore stability.
The superseded directors challenged the decision before the Bombay High Court. During the legal proceedings, the board’s original term expired in May 2024. RBI later extended the supersession period.
Why The Directors Challenged RBI’s Decision
The former directors argued that Article 243ZL(1) of the Constitution limits the supersession of a co-operative society’s board to six months. They claimed that RBI could not continue the supersession beyond this period. They also contended that consultation with the State Government was necessary before superseding the board.
RBI’s Regulatory Powers Cannot Be Limited By Six-Month Rule
The Supreme Court rejected the argument that the six-month limit automatically applies to multi-state co-operative banks. The Court emphasized that the Constitution specifically provides that the Banking Regulation Act applies to co-operative banks.
According to the Bench, adopting a narrow interpretation would weaken RBI’s ability to regulate banks and protect depositors. Such an interpretation could create a regulatory vacuum at a time when supervision is most needed.
Protection Of Depositors Remains A Priority
The Court observed that banking regulation serves a larger public purpose. RBI is responsible for maintaining financial stability, protecting depositors, and ensuring discipline in the banking sector. Therefore, its authority cannot be curtailed by a rigid six-month restriction.
Multi-State Co-Operative Bank Board Removal Rule: RBI Can Extend Supersession Beyond Board’s Original Tenure
The Supreme Court also rejected the claim that RBI’s order cannot continue beyond the board’s original term of office. Once a board is superseded, it ceases to function and all powers are transferred to the Administrator. As a result, the supersession order can legally continue even after the period for which the original board was elected has expired.
Multi-State Co-Operative Bank Board Removal Rule: State Government Consultation Not Required
The Court clarified that the constitutional provision requiring consultation with a State Government applies only to co-operative banks registered under a State Registrar of Co-operative Societies.
Since Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank is a multi-state co-operative bank, it does not fall within that category. Therefore, RBI was not legally required to consult any State Government before superseding the board.
FAQs
No. The Court held that consultation requirements apply only to certain state-registered co-operative banks and not to multi-state co-operative banks.
Yes. The Supreme Court has ruled that RBI’s powers under the Banking Regulation Act are not restricted by the six-month limit mentioned in Article 243ZL for multi-state co-operative banks.
The case involved Abhyudaya Co-operative Bank Limited, whose Board of Directors was superseded by the RBI due to concerns regarding the bank’s financial condition and governance.
