New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up senior Tamil Nadu IPS officer A. Arun (1998 batch) over his handling of a preventive detention case. However, the apex court agreed to expunge the adverse remarks made against him by the Madras High Court after he tendered an unconditional apology.
The Supreme Court also emphasised that preventive detention powers must be exercised by public authorities with great circumspection, given their impact on personal liberty.
A. Arun is currently serving as Director of the Tamil Nadu Police Academy. He had approached the Supreme Court seeking the removal of adverse observations made against him by the Madras High Court in a case concerning a detention order issued when he was serving as Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai.
Supreme Court Accepts A. Arun’s Unconditional Apology
A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath, R. Mahadevan and Aparesh Kumar Singh accepted Arun’s unconditional apology for an error committed while exercising his statutory powers.
The bench directed that the adverse observations made against the officer by the Madras High Court be expunged. However, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision to quash the preventive detention order.
While accepting the apology, the apex court cautioned that senior police officers must fully understand the responsibility attached to the exercise of statutory powers, particularly when such powers affect an individual’s personal liberty.
Read also: Veeramani POCSO Probe: SIT Questions Former Chennai Police Chief A. Arun, Two Other IPS Officers
What Was the Preventive Detention Case?
The case relates to a preventive detention order issued by A. Arun under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982, when he was serving as Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai.
The detention order classified the respondent’s father as a ‘Goonda’ following allegations of cheating in a real estate transaction involving more than ₹1.38 crore.
According to the allegations, the detenue and his wife, who were directors of a real estate company, had allegedly cheated a buyer by failing to hand over an apartment despite the execution of agreements and payment of approximately ₹1.38 crore.
The property was subsequently allegedly transferred to third parties and mortgaged using forged documents. A criminal case was registered against the couple, leading to their arrest on September 1, 2025.
Madras High Court Quashed Detention Order, Made Adverse Remarks
The detenue’s daughter challenged the detention order before the Madras High Court. The High Court set aside the order and also made adverse observations against A. Arun.
The High Court reportedly observed that the officer was habitual in passing such detention orders. It also criticised his appointment as Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption.
Following these observations, Arun approached the Supreme Court seeking their expunction. He tendered an unconditional apology for the error committed while passing the detention order.
Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Detention
While agreeing to remove the adverse remarks against Arun, the Supreme Court did not interfere with the Madras High Court’s decision to quash the detention order.
The apex court’s observations underline the need for caution when public authorities exercise preventive detention powers. It also reminded senior police officers that statutory authority must be exercised with a full understanding of its consequences, especially when an individual’s liberty is at stake.
Read also: Read also: Supreme Court Cancels IPS Officer Srinath Mahadev’s Anticipatory Bail in Karnataka Lokayuktha Corruption Case
