New Delhi: The CJI Surya Kant collegium examination Of allegations has become a major topic in India’s judicial system after Supreme Court Judge Justice Sandeep Mehta raised concerns about Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant confirmed that the Supreme Court Collegium is examining the matter and that due process will be followed before any decision is taken.
The development comes after Justice Mehta reportedly wrote multiple letters seeking administrative action and the appointment of a regular Chief Justice for the Rajasthan High Court.
Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma Case: What Did CJI Surya Kant Say
CJI Surya Kant stated that the concerns raised by Justice Sandeep Mehta have been taken seriously and are currently under examination by the Collegium.
Read also: Why Did SCBA Oppose the Resolution Against Meghalaya Advocate General Amit Kumar
He emphasized that allegations cannot be decided in the public domain and that every judge must be given a fair opportunity to respond before conclusions are reached. The CJI also indicated that institutional procedures are being followed while examining the complaints.
Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma Case: Why Did Justice Sandeep Mehta Raise Concerns
According to reports, Justice Sandeep Mehta wrote to the Chief Justice of India expressing concerns regarding the functioning of Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma.
The letters reportedly alleged misuse of administrative powers, manipulation of case listings, favoritism, and issues related to court administration.
Request For Administrative Changes
Justice Mehta is also reported to have sought the appointment of a regular Chief Justice from another High Court and requested the transfer of the acting Chief Justice outside Rajasthan.
What Is The Supreme Court Collegium
The Collegium is the body responsible for recommending appointments and transfers of judges in higher judiciary institutions. It consists of the Chief Justice of India and senior Supreme Court judges. The system plays a central role in maintaining judicial independence and handling sensitive judicial matters.
How Does The Collegium Examine Complaints
When concerns involving senior judges arise, the Collegium may review documents, seek responses from concerned individuals, and examine all available facts before reaching any conclusion. This process is intended to ensure fairness, transparency, and institutional integrity.
Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma Case: Rajasthan High Court And The Current Situation
The Rajasthan High Court is one of India’s major constitutional courts and currently functions under Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma. The controversy has drawn national attention because it involves concerns raised by a sitting Supreme Court judge regarding judicial administration.
Read also: Supreme Court Collegium Faces Legal Challenge Over Himachal Pradesh High Court Judge Appointments
FAQs
Reports indicate that the allegations include misuse of administrative powers, manipulation of case listings, favoritism, and maladministration.
The Collegium is reviewing concerns raised by Justice Sandeep Mehta regarding the functioning of Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and is following established judicial procedures.
CJI Surya Kant said the matter is under examination and emphasized that no conclusion can be drawn until all concerned parties are heard.
