New Delhi; The supreme court bar association urges Meghalaya bar bodies to withdraw resolution against Advocate General Amit Kumar, saying that the action taken against him was not justified because the matter was already being examined by the Meghalaya High Court. The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has called for a reconsideration of the resolution passed by two Meghalaya bar associations and has stressed the need for a balanced approach that protects both lawyers and women legal professionals.
The issue has drawn attention across legal circles after the Meghalaya High Court Bar Association and the Shillong Bar Association passed a joint resolution seeking action against Meghalaya Advocate General Amit Kumar. The associations also called for his removal from the post of Advocate General over remarks related to the safety of women lawyers and law interns.
What Did the SCBA Say in Advocate General Amit Kumar Case
The Supreme Court Bar Association released a statement urging the Meghalaya bar associations to withdraw the resolution.
According to the SCBA, Kumar’s submissions were made during ongoing judicial proceedings before the Meghalaya High Court. Since the matter was already under the Court’s consideration, the association said that disciplinary action against him based on those submissions was unwarranted.
The SCBA emphasized that the context in which the remarks were made should be carefully considered before any conclusions are drawn.
Why Was the Resolution Passed
The controversy began during proceedings before the Meghalaya High Court involving allegations of physical assault and public parading of an advocate in Shillong.
The advocate had earlier been accused of molesting a law intern. During hearings, concerns were raised regarding the safety of lawyers as well as women advocates and law interns.
Following the proceedings, the Meghalaya High Court Bar Association and the Shillong Bar Association passed a joint resolution expressing dissatisfaction with Amit Kumar’s remarks. The associations argued that the comments suggested bar bodies had failed to provide a safe environment for women lawyers. As a result, they sought his removal as Advocate General and recommended that he be removed from their membership rolls.
SCBA Calls for Constructive Solutions
The SCBA stated that while the safety of all members of the legal profession is important, equal attention must be given to protecting the dignity and security of women advocates and law interns.
The association noted that Kumar, during his submissions before the High Court, had highlighted the need to ensure protection for women legal professionals.
The SCBA said that these observations were made within the framework of judicial proceedings and should not be viewed outside their legal context.
Concern Over Escalating Tensions in Advocate General Amit Kumar Case
The Supreme Court Bar Association also expressed concern that the resolution could further intensify tensions within the legal community.
Instead of pursuing disciplinary measures, the association suggested that stakeholders work together to create effective and confidential mechanisms through which women advocates and law interns can report grievances and seek redressal.
According to the SCBA, ensuring a safe and respectful environment for every member of the legal profession should remain a shared responsibility.
Background of the Advocate General Amit Kumar Case
The matter originated from an incident in Shillong that came under judicial scrutiny before the Meghalaya High Court.
During the hearings, the Court reportedly expressed concern over the alleged failure of authorities to act despite police presence during the incident.
Subsequent discussions on lawyer safety, women’s security, and institutional accountability led to wider debate within the legal community and eventually resulted in the resolution against Amit Kumar.
Read also: Supreme Court Clarifies Article 12: Bar Associations Not Subject to Writ Jurisdiction
