Patna: The Patna High Court has ruled that a Permanent Lok Adalat cannot record a compromise in a land dispute because its legal powers are limited to matters involving public utility services. The Court also set aside a 2011 award passed in a family land partition dispute, declaring it void from the beginning.
The judgment clarifies the jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalats under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and explains why land disputes cannot be settled through this particular legal forum.
Why Did The Patna High Court Set Aside The Permanent Lok Adalat Award
The case involved a land partition dispute between family members over their ancestral property.
Read also: Lok Adalat Monetary Limit: Kerala HC Clarifies No Upper Cap on Settlement Value
The dispute began when the father of respondent Nos. 11 to 14 filed a partition case on September 14, 2010. He claimed a one-fourth share in the ancestral property.
During the proceedings, the family members reached a mutual settlement. Following this agreement, the Permanent Lok Adalat in Sasaram, Rohtas, Bihar, passed an award on July 7, 2011. However, the petitioner, Bigan Shah, later claimed that some details of the disputed land had been accidentally left out of the award because of a typographical mistake.
Permanent Lok Adalat Land Dispute Powers: What Was The Petitioner’s Main Argument
Bigan Shah approached the Patna High Court seeking correction of the 2011 award. He argued that the compromise document dated May 9, 2011, was an important part of the award. However, certain property details were missing from the final document.
The petitioner specifically wanted Khata No. 69, Plot No. 271, measuring 1.5 decimals, to be added to Schedule-C of the compromise.
He described the omission as a genuine typing mistake and requested the Court to direct the Permanent Lok Adalat to correct its award.
Permanent Lok Adalat Land Dispute Powers: What Did The Respondents Argue
The respondents opposed the petitioner’s request. Their lawyers argued that a Permanent Lok Adalat does not have the power to review or modify its own award, even if someone claims that a mistake occurred while preparing the document.
This raised an important legal question about the powers and jurisdiction of a Permanent Lok Adalat.
Permanent Lok Adalat Land Dispute Powers: What Did The Patna High Court Rule
Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy examined the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
The Court explained that Sections 22-A and 22-B(1) limit the jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalats to disputes related to public utility services.
These services include transport, postal services, telephone services, electricity, water supply, hospital services and insurance. The Court held that a land partition dispute does not fall within this category.
Therefore, a Permanent Lok Adalat cannot legally record a compromise in a land dispute. The High Court declared that the award passed on July 7, 2011, was void ab initio. This means the award was legally invalid from the very beginning.
Why Did The Court Set Aside The Entire 2011 Award
The petitioner had approached the High Court only to correct the alleged mistake in the property details. However, the High Court found a more fundamental legal problem.
The Permanent Lok Adalat did not have the legal authority to deal with the land dispute in the first place. As a result, the Court did not simply order a correction to the award. Instead, it set aside the entire award dated July 7, 2011.
Where Can The Parties Record Their Land Dispute Compromise
Although the High Court cancelled the Permanent Lok Adalat award, it did not prevent the parties from pursuing a lawful settlement. The Court gave the parties two options:
- They can approach the competent Civil Court to get their compromise recorded.
- They can file an application before the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), Sasaram, as a pre-litigation case for recording their compromise.
This gives the parties an opportunity to resolve their dispute through the appropriate legal process.
What Is The Difference Between A Lok Adalat And A Permanent Lok Adalat
A Lok Adalat is a legal forum that helps parties settle disputes through mutual agreement. It can deal with eligible pending court cases and certain pre-litigation disputes.
A Permanent Lok Adalat is a separate legal institution established under Section 22-B of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
Its jurisdiction is specifically connected with public utility services. It also has certain powers to decide disputes when the parties fail to reach a settlement, subject to the conditions of the law. Therefore, both forums have different legal powers and jurisdictions. The Patna High Court’s ruling specifically concerns the jurisdiction of a Permanent Lok Adalat in land disputes.
Read also: Centre Plans Evening Courts In These 3 States To Reduce India’s Pending Cases
FAQs
The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, defines the jurisdiction of Permanent Lok Adalats. Sections 22-A and 22-B deal with their scope and establishment.
No. According to the Patna High Court, a Permanent Lok Adalat does not have jurisdiction to record a compromise in a land dispute because its powers are limited to public utility service matters.
According to the Patna High Court, the parties can approach a competent Civil Court or file a pre-litigation application before the District Legal Services Authority for recording their compromise.
