Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday expressed strong disapproval of what it termed a “differential transfer policy” adopted by the Punjab Police, questioning why tenure norms apply only to lower-rank officers and not to senior officials.
A division bench headed by Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal directed Punjab Director General of Police (DGP) Gaurav Yadav (IPS:1992:PB) to clarify whether transfer norms applicable to constables through inspectors would also be extended to higher-ranking officers.
Court Flags Disparity in Transfer Norms
During the hearing, DGP Gaurav Yadav, appearing via videoconference, informed the court that as per instructions dated May 21, 2020, police personnel from the rank of constable to inspector can be deputed in a particular district for a maximum of three years.
The bench, however, observed:
“It is strange that such a policy is applicable to only lower rank police officials. Such a policy ought to be applicable to higher ranks.”
The High Court directed the DGP to file an affidavit clarifying the policy position and to consider transferring officers of the rank of inspector and above who have completed three years in a district at a stretch.
The matter has been listed for further hearing on February 18, 2026.
Manpower Audit and Security Review
The DGP informed the court that a manpower audit is currently being conducted in the state. He also submitted that security arrangements for individuals currently under police protection have been reviewed to ensure optimal deployment of personnel.
In an affidavit regarding measures to tackle organised crime, the police informed the court that:
- A review of security provided to protectees has been initiated.
- Efforts are being made to ensure adequate manpower for patrolling and law and order duties.
Steps are underway to instill public confidence and curb organised crime.
Mohali Court Complex Incident: Charge Sheet Filed
The High Court also examined developments in the Mohali Court Complex incident. Punjab Police informed the bench that a charge sheet was filed on February 7, 2026.
To ensure transparency in the investigation, the court directed authorities to produce the case diary, detailing progress from the registration of the FIR to the filing of the charge sheet.
Prime Minister’s 2022 Security Lapse: Status Sought
The bench took note of pending disciplinary proceedings against the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) in connection with the January 20, 2022 security lapse during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Punjab.
The state government sought time to inform the court about the status of the disciplinary proceedings. The court has asked for an updated report in the next hearing.
Extortion Helpline: 279 Calls Received
The High Court also examined action taken on extortion complaints received through a helpline number set up on January 21.
The DGP informed the court that:
- 279 calls related to extortion and threats have been received so far.
- The bench directed the DGP to provide:
- Details of action taken on these complaints
- Clarification on whether any complainant faced physical harm after reporting threats
- Prison Security Measures Under Scrutiny
The court further directed the Principal Secretary (Jails), Punjab, to file a status report on measures taken to strengthen prison security, in compliance with earlier judicial directions.
Next Hearing on February 18
The High Court has adjourned the matter to February 18, 2026, seeking detailed compliance reports from the DGP and other concerned authorities.
The proceedings reflect the court’s broader concern over administrative transparency, police accountability, tenure policy uniformity, organised crime control, and institutional security reforms in Punjab.
