Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court Bar Association has raised strong objections against the appointment of Delhi-based lawyers as judges of the Allahabad High Court. The issue has triggered a fresh debate over judicial appointments, regional representation, and opportunities for local advocates.
The Bar Association has formally written to the President of India and other constitutional authorities regarding the matter.
Details of the Allahabad HC Appointment Row?
According to reports, the Allahabad High Court Bar Association objected to the increasing number of advocates from Delhi being appointed as judges in the Allahabad High Court. The association stated that many experienced lawyers practicing regularly in Uttar Pradesh are allegedly being overlooked.
Read also: Who Is ‘Hon’ble’ in India? Allahabad High Court Explains Who Qualifies and Why It Matters in Law
The Bar Association reportedly sent a letter to:
- The President of India
- The Chief Justice of India
- The Union Law Ministry
The letter claimed that local lawyers who have long served in the Allahabad High Court deserve equal and fair consideration for elevation as judges.
Allahabad HC Appointment Row: Key Concerns Raised by the Bar Association
The association highlighted several major concerns:
- Local advocates are allegedly not getting enough representation.
- Lawyers practicing in Delhi are increasingly being preferred.
- The trend may affect morale among lawyers practicing in Uttar Pradesh.
- Judicial appointments should reflect regional legal experience and local court understanding.
The Bar Association also reportedly questioned whether continuous appointments from outside the state could impact confidence among practicing advocates at the Allahabad High Court.
How Judges Are Appointed in High Courts
In India, High Court judges are appointed through the collegium system. The process involves recommendations by senior judges of the judiciary and approval by the Central Government.
Important authorities involved include:
- The Chief Justice of India
- Supreme Court Collegium
- Central Government
- President of India
The current controversy has again brought attention to transparency and fairness in judicial appointments.
Growing Debate Over Judicial Representation
The issue has sparked discussion in legal circles regarding:
- Regional balance in judicial appointments
- Representation of local Bar members
- Transparency in the collegium process
- Merit versus regional preference
Some legal observers believe appointments should remain merit-based regardless of location. Others argue that advocates familiar with local legal conditions and regional litigation patterns should receive greater priority in state High Courts.
Read also: Power of Attorney vs Advocates Act: Allahabad High Court Ends Confusion on Who Can Argue in Court
