Karnataka: The Bengaluru Advocates Association opposition to Mangaluru bench has sparked a major legal debate in Karnataka. The association has written to the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, raising concerns over the State Government’s proposal to establish a circuit bench in Mangaluru. The issue highlights tensions between regional access to justice and administrative feasibility.
Details of Mangaluru Bench Controversy
- The Karnataka Government has proposed a circuit bench of the High Court in Mangaluru.
- The aim is to serve people in coastal districts like Dakshina Kannada, Udupi, and Uttara Kannada.
- This move is being discussed as a way to improve access to justice.
Read also: Explained: Why Karnataka High Court Said Singing Full ‘Vande Mataram’ in Schools Is Not Compulsory
Mangaluru Bench Controversy: Bengaluru Advocates Association’s Stand
- The Advocates’ Association Bengaluru (AAB) has opposed the proposal.
- A letter was sent to the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court.
Key Concerns Raised
- No proper stakeholder consultation was done.
- No empirical study or data supports the need.
- The proposal is called:
- “Premature”
- “Unwarranted”
Why Are Advocates Opposing It?
- Fear of fragmentation of judicial functioning.
- Concerns over resource allocation.
- Possible administrative inefficiency.
State Government’s View
- The State believes:
- A Mangaluru bench will reduce travel burden for litigants.
- It will improve regional justice delivery.
- Coastal districts need better legal infrastructure.
